Kenya vs New Zealand: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Kenya
92
in 2019
New Zealand
86
in 2019
Kenya rank
1st
New Zealand rank
3rd
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Kenya
- New Zealand
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 92 against 86 in New Zealand, a difference of 6.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was New Zealand ahead.
Kenya ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Kenya or New Zealand?
- Kenya, at 92 against 86 in New Zealand as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Kenya and New Zealand?
- 6, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and New Zealand?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Kenya and New Zealand rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- Kenya ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 3rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.