Jordan vs United Republic of Tanzania: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score

Jordan
50
in 2019
United Republic of Tanzania
50
in 2019
Jordan rank
105th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
105th

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Jordan
  • United Republic of Tanzania
01020304050201320162019

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 50 against 50 in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0.

Across all 7 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Jordan ranks 105th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 105th of 190 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Jordan or United Republic of Tanzania?
Jordan, at 50 against 50 in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2019.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Jordan and United Republic of Tanzania?
0, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and United Republic of Tanzania?
7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
How do Jordan and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
Jordan ranks 105th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 105th of 190 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs United Republic of Tanzania: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-db15-20-methodology-score/jordan/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-db15-20-methodology-score/jordan/tanzania/">Jordan vs United Republic of Tanzania: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,330 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.