Israel vs Chinese Taipei: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Israel
78
in 2019
Chinese Taipei
76
in 2019
Israel rank
18th
Chinese Taipei rank
21st
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Israel
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Israel currently reports 78 against 76 in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 2.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 18th and Chinese Taipei ranks 21st of 190 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Israel or Chinese Taipei?
- Israel, at 78 against 76 in Chinese Taipei as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Israel and Chinese Taipei?
- 2, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Chinese Taipei?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Israel and Chinese Taipei rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- Israel ranks 18th and Chinese Taipei ranks 21st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.