Hong Kong, China vs Kazakhstan: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Hong Kong, China
84
in 2019
Kazakhstan
84
in 2019
Hong Kong, China rank
7th
Kazakhstan rank
7th
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 84 against 84 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 7th and Kazakhstan ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Hong Kong, China or Kazakhstan?
- Hong Kong, China, at 84 against 84 in Kazakhstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Hong Kong, China and Kazakhstan?
- 0, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Kazakhstan?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Kazakhstan rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 7th and Kazakhstan ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.