Grenada vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Grenada
50
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis
52
in 2019
Grenada rank
105th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
103rd
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Grenada
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 52 against 50 in Grenada, a difference of 2.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 105th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 103rd of 190 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Grenada or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 52 against 50 in Grenada as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Grenada and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 2, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Grenada and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- Grenada ranks 105th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 103rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.