Congo, Democratic Republic of the vs Marshall Islands, Republic of the: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the
- Marshall Islands, Republic of the
How they compare
Congo, Democratic Republic of the currently reports 22 against 20 in Marshall Islands, Republic of the, a difference of 2.
That makes Congo, Democratic Republic of the's figure about 1.1 times Marshall Islands, Republic of the's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Marshall Islands, Republic of the ahead.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 176th and Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 179th of 190 countries.
Congo, Democratic Republic of the has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Congo, Democratic Republic of the or Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the, at 22 against 20 in Marshall Islands, Republic of the as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
- 2, with Congo, Democratic Republic of the ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Marshall Islands, Republic of the?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Congo, Democratic Republic of the and Marshall Islands, Republic of the rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- Congo, Democratic Republic of the ranks 176th and Marshall Islands, Republic of the ranks 179th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.