Comoros vs Equatorial Guinea: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score

Comoros
26
in 2019
Equatorial Guinea
26
in 2019
Comoros rank
160th
Equatorial Guinea rank
160th

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • Comoros
  • Equatorial Guinea
0102030201320162019

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 26 against 26 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 160th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 160th of 188 countries.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Comoros or Equatorial Guinea?
Comoros, at 26 against 26 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2019.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Comoros and Equatorial Guinea?
0, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Equatorial Guinea?
7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
How do Comoros and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
Comoros ranks 160th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 160th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,330 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.