China (People’s Republic of) vs Korea: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
China (People’s Republic of)
72
in 2019
Korea
74
in 2019
China (People’s Republic of) rank
28th
Korea rank
25th
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- China (People’s Republic of)
- Korea
How they compare
Korea currently reports 74 against 72 in China (People’s Republic of), a difference of 2.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Korea has been ahead every year.
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 28th and Korea ranks 25th of 190 countries.
Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, China (People’s Republic of) or Korea?
- Korea, at 74 against 72 in China (People’s Republic of) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between China (People’s Republic of) and Korea?
- 2, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Korea?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do China (People’s Republic of) and Korea rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- China (People’s Republic of) ranks 28th and Korea ranks 25th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.