China, People's Republic of vs Iceland: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
China, People's Republic of
72
in 2019
Iceland
72
in 2019
China, People's Republic of rank
28th
Iceland rank
28th
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- China, People's Republic of
- Iceland
How they compare
China, People's Republic of currently reports 72 against 72 in Iceland, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
China, People's Republic of ranks 28th and Iceland ranks 28th of 190 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, China, People's Republic of or Iceland?
- China, People's Republic of, at 72 against 72 in Iceland as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between China, People's Republic of and Iceland?
- 0, with China, People's Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, People's Republic of and Iceland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do China, People's Republic of and Iceland rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- China, People's Republic of ranks 28th and Iceland ranks 28th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.