China vs Denmark: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score

China
72
in 2019
Denmark
72
in 2019
China rank
28th
Denmark rank
28th

Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time

  • China
  • Denmark
020406080201320162019

How they compare

China currently reports 72 against 72 in Denmark, a difference of 0.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

China ranks 28th and Denmark ranks 28th of 188 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, China or Denmark?
China, at 72 against 72 in Denmark as of 2019.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between China and Denmark?
0, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Denmark?
7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
How do China and Denmark rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
China ranks 28th and Denmark ranks 28th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,330 data points, 2013–2019
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.