Canada vs Hong Kong: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Canada
84
in 2019
Hong Kong
84
in 2019
Canada rank
7th
Hong Kong rank
7th
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Canada
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Canada currently reports 84 against 84 in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 7th and Hong Kong ranks 7th of 191 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Canada or Hong Kong?
- Canada, at 84 against 84 in Hong Kong as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Canada and Hong Kong?
- 0, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Hong Kong?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Canada and Hong Kong rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- Canada ranks 7th and Hong Kong ranks 7th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.