Cameroon vs Suriname: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Cameroon
28
in 2019
Suriname
28
in 2019
Cameroon rank
157th
Suriname rank
157th
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Cameroon
- Suriname
How they compare
Cameroon currently reports 28 against 28 in Suriname, a difference of 0.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 157th and Suriname ranks 157th of 190 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Cameroon or Suriname?
- Cameroon, at 28 against 28 in Suriname as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Cameroon and Suriname?
- 0, with Cameroon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Suriname?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Cameroon and Suriname rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- Cameroon ranks 157th and Suriname ranks 157th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.