Bhutan vs Palestine, State of: Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score
Bhutan
46
in 2019
Palestine, State of
44
in 2019
Bhutan rank
111th
Palestine, State of rank
114th
Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score over time
- Bhutan
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 46 against 44 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 2.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Bhutan ranks 111th and Palestine, State of ranks 114th of 191 countries.
Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score, Bhutan or Palestine, State of?
- Bhutan, at 46 against 44 in Palestine, State of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score between Bhutan and Palestine, State of?
- 2, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Palestine, State of?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Bhutan and Palestine, State of rank globally for protecting minority investors (db15-20 methodology) - score?
- Bhutan ranks 111th and Palestine, State of ranks 114th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB15-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB15-20 studies.