Trinidad and Tobago vs Türkiye: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Trinidad and Tobago
66.67
in 2013
Türkiye
66.67
in 2013
Trinidad and Tobago rank
23rd
Türkiye rank
23rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Trinidad and Tobago
- Türkiye
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Türkiye, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 23rd and Türkiye ranks 23rd of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Trinidad and Tobago | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 66.67 | 54.67 | 12 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 59.17 | 7.5 | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Trinidad and Tobago or Türkiye?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Türkiye as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Trinidad and Tobago and Türkiye?
- 0, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Trinidad and Tobago and Türkiye?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Trinidad and Tobago and Türkiye rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 23rd and Türkiye ranks 23rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.