Serbia vs Tonga: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Serbia
46.67
in 2013
Tonga
46.67
in 2013
Serbia rank
113th
Tonga rank
113th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Serbia
- Tonga
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 46.67 against 46.67 in Tonga, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Serbia ranks 113th and Tonga ranks 113th of 188 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.67 | 46.67 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 46.67 | 46.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Serbia or Tonga?
- Serbia, at 46.67 against 46.67 in Tonga as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Serbia and Tonga?
- 0, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Tonga?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Serbia and Tonga rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Serbia ranks 113th and Tonga ranks 113th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.