Saudi Arabia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Saudi Arabia
66.67
in 2013
Trinidad and Tobago
66.67
in 2013
Saudi Arabia rank
23rd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
23rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.
Saudi Arabia ranks 23rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 23rd of 191 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.67 | 66.67 | 6 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2010s | 66.67 | 66.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Saudi Arabia or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Saudi Arabia, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Saudi Arabia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 23rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 23rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.