San Marino vs Timor-Leste: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
San Marino
43.33
in 2013
Timor-Leste
43.33
in 2013
San Marino rank
128th
Timor-Leste rank
128th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- San Marino
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 43.33 against 43.33 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Timor-Leste has been ahead every year.
San Marino ranks 128th and Timor-Leste ranks 128th of 191 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | San Marino | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.33 | 43.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 43.33 | 43.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, San Marino or Timor-Leste?
- San Marino, at 43.33 against 43.33 in Timor-Leste as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between San Marino and Timor-Leste?
- 0, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Timor-Leste?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do San Marino and Timor-Leste rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- San Marino ranks 128th and Timor-Leste ranks 128th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.