Philippines vs East Timor: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Philippines
43.33
in 2013
East Timor
43.33
in 2013
Philippines rank
126th
East Timor rank
126th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Philippines
- East Timor
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 43.33 against 43.33 in East Timor, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, East Timor has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 126th and East Timor ranks 126th of 188 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.33 | 43.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 43.33 | 43.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Philippines or East Timor?
- Philippines, at 43.33 against 43.33 in East Timor as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Philippines and East Timor?
- 0, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and East Timor?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Philippines and East Timor rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Philippines ranks 126th and East Timor ranks 126th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.