New Zealand vs Singapore: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score

New Zealand
96.67
in 2013
Singapore
93.33
in 2013
New Zealand rank
1st
Singapore rank
2nd

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • New Zealand
  • Singapore
020406080100200520092013

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 96.67 against 93.33 in Singapore, a difference of 3.34.

Across all 9 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 191 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Singapore Difference Ahead
2000s 96.67 93.33 3.33 New Zealand
2010s 96.67 93.33 3.33 New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, New Zealand or Singapore?
New Zealand, at 96.67 against 93.33 in Singapore as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between New Zealand and Singapore?
3.34, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Singapore?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do New Zealand and Singapore rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
New Zealand ranks 1st and Singapore ranks 2nd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Singapore: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/new-zealand/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/protecting-minority-investors-db06-14-methodology-score/new-zealand/singapore/">New Zealand vs Singapore: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,719 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.