Netherlands vs Tonga: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score

Netherlands
46.67
in 2013
Tonga
46.67
in 2013
Netherlands rank
113th
Tonga rank
113th

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Netherlands
  • Tonga
01020304050200520092013

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 46.67 against 46.67 in Tonga, a difference of 0.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.

Netherlands ranks 113th and Tonga ranks 113th of 188 countries.

Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Netherlands Tonga Difference Ahead
2000s 43.33 46.67 3.33 Tonga
2010s 45 46.67 1.67 Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Netherlands or Tonga?
Netherlands, at 46.67 against 46.67 in Tonga as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Netherlands and Tonga?
0, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Netherlands and Tonga?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Netherlands and Tonga rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Netherlands ranks 113th and Tonga ranks 113th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.