Namibia vs Vanuatu: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Namibia
53.33
in 2013
Vanuatu
53.33
in 2013
Namibia rank
83rd
Vanuatu rank
83rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Namibia
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 53.33 against 53.33 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Vanuatu has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 83rd and Vanuatu ranks 83rd of 188 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.33 | 53.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 53.33 | 53.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Namibia or Vanuatu?
- Namibia, at 53.33 against 53.33 in Vanuatu as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Namibia and Vanuatu?
- 0, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Vanuatu?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Namibia and Vanuatu rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Namibia ranks 83rd and Vanuatu ranks 83rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.