Myanmar vs Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Myanmar
23.33
in 2013
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
23.33
in 2013
Myanmar rank
182nd
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of rank
182nd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Myanmar
- Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 23.33 against 23.33 in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of has been ahead every year.
Myanmar ranks 182nd and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 182nd of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.33 | 23.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 23.33 | 23.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Myanmar or Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- Myanmar, at 23.33 against 23.33 in Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Myanmar and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- 0, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Myanmar and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Myanmar ranks 182nd and Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of ranks 182nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.