Mozambique, Republic of vs Panama: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Mozambique, Republic of
53.33
in 2013
Panama
53.33
in 2013
Mozambique, Republic of rank
83rd
Panama rank
83rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Mozambique, Republic of
- Panama
How they compare
Mozambique, Republic of currently reports 53.33 against 53.33 in Panama, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Panama ahead.
Mozambique, Republic of ranks 83rd and Panama ranks 83rd of 190 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Mozambique, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique, Republic of | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 48 | 50 | 2 | Panama |
| 2010s | 53.33 | 50.83 | 2.5 | Mozambique, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Mozambique, Republic of or Panama?
- Mozambique, Republic of, at 53.33 against 53.33 in Panama as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Mozambique, Republic of and Panama?
- 0, with Mozambique, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique, Republic of and Panama?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Mozambique, Republic of and Panama rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Mozambique, Republic of ranks 83rd and Panama ranks 83rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.