Mongolia vs Slovenia: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score

Mongolia
70
in 2013
Slovenia
73.33
in 2013
Mongolia rank
16th
Slovenia rank
14th

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Mongolia
  • Slovenia
020406080200520092013

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 73.33 against 70 in Mongolia, a difference of 3.33.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mongolia ahead.

Mongolia ranks 16th and Slovenia ranks 14th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Slovenia Difference Ahead
2000s 66.67 64.67 2 Mongolia
2010s 68.33 70 1.67 Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Mongolia or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 73.33 against 70 in Mongolia as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Mongolia and Slovenia?
3.33, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Slovenia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Mongolia and Slovenia rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Mongolia ranks 16th and Slovenia ranks 14th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.