Mexico vs Zambia: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Mexico
56.67
in 2013
Zambia
56.67
in 2013
Mexico rank
67th
Zambia rank
67th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Mexico
- Zambia
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 56.67 against 56.67 in Zambia, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Mexico ranks 67th and Zambia ranks 67th of 190 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 52 | 56.67 | 4.67 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 56.67 | 56.67 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Mexico or Zambia?
- Mexico, at 56.67 against 56.67 in Zambia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Mexico and Zambia?
- 0, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Zambia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Mexico and Zambia rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Mexico ranks 67th and Zambia ranks 67th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.