Maldives vs Panama: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Maldives
53.33
in 2013
Panama
53.33
in 2013
Maldives rank
83rd
Panama rank
83rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Maldives
- Panama
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 53.33 against 53.33 in Panama, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Maldives ahead.
Maldives ranks 83rd and Panama ranks 83rd of 190 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.33 | 50 | 3.33 | Maldives |
| 2010s | 53.33 | 50.83 | 2.5 | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Maldives or Panama?
- Maldives, at 53.33 against 53.33 in Panama as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Maldives and Panama?
- 0, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Panama?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Maldives and Panama rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Maldives ranks 83rd and Panama ranks 83rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.