Malaysia vs Singapore: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Malaysia
90
in 2013
Singapore
93.33
in 2013
Malaysia rank
3rd
Singapore rank
2nd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Malaysia
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 93.33 against 90 in Malaysia, a difference of 3.33.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 2nd of 190 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.67 | 93.33 | 6.67 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 87.5 | 93.33 | 5.83 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Malaysia or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 93.33 against 90 in Malaysia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Malaysia and Singapore?
- 3.33, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Singapore?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Malaysia and Singapore rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Malaysia ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 2nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.