Libya vs Micronesia (country): Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Libya
26.67
in 2013
Micronesia (country)
26.67
in 2013
Libya rank
175th
Micronesia (country) rank
175th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Libya
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Libya currently reports 26.67 against 26.67 in Micronesia (country), a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 175th and Micronesia (country) ranks 175th of 188 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.33 | 26.67 | 13.33 | Micronesia (country) |
| 2010s | 20 | 26.67 | 6.67 | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Libya or Micronesia (country)?
- Libya, at 26.67 against 26.67 in Micronesia (country) as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Libya and Micronesia (country)?
- 0, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Micronesia (country)?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Libya and Micronesia (country) rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Libya ranks 175th and Micronesia (country) ranks 175th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.