Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Somalia: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Somalia
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 16.67 against 0 in Somalia, a difference of 16.67.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Lao People's Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 187th and Somalia ranks 190th of 190 countries.
Lao People's Democratic Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.67 | 0 | 16.67 | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
| 2010s | 16.67 | 0 | 16.67 | Lao People's Democratic Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Somalia?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 16.67 against 0 in Somalia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Somalia?
- 16.67, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Somalia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Somalia rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 187th and Somalia ranks 190th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.