Kuwait vs Palestine, State of: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Kuwait
53.33
in 2013
Palestine, State of
53.33
in 2013
Kuwait rank
83rd
Palestine, State of rank
83rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Kuwait
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 53.33 against 53.33 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Palestine, State of has been ahead every year.
Kuwait ranks 83rd and Palestine, State of ranks 83rd of 191 countries.
Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50 | 53.33 | 3.33 | Palestine, State of |
| 2010s | 50.83 | 53.33 | 2.5 | Palestine, State of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Kuwait or Palestine, State of?
- Kuwait, at 53.33 against 53.33 in Palestine, State of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Kuwait and Palestine, State of?
- 0, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Palestine, State of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Kuwait and Palestine, State of rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Kuwait ranks 83rd and Palestine, State of ranks 83rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.