Kuwait vs Maldives: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score

Kuwait
53.33
in 2013
Maldives
53.33
in 2013
Kuwait rank
83rd
Maldives rank
83rd

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Kuwait
  • Maldives
0204060200520092013

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 53.33 against 53.33 in Maldives, a difference of 0.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.

Kuwait ranks 83rd and Maldives ranks 83rd of 188 countries.

Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Maldives Difference Ahead
2000s 50 53.33 3.33 Maldives
2010s 50.83 53.33 2.5 Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Kuwait or Maldives?
Kuwait, at 53.33 against 53.33 in Maldives as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Kuwait and Maldives?
0, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Maldives?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Kuwait and Maldives rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Kuwait ranks 83rd and Maldives ranks 83rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.