South Korea vs Kyrgyzstan: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
South Korea
66.67
in 2013
Kyrgyzstan
66.67
in 2013
South Korea rank
23rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
23rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- South Korea
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
South Korea currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was South Korea ahead.
South Korea ranks 23rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 23rd of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 58.67 | 1.33 | South Korea |
| 2010s | 63.33 | 66.67 | 3.33 | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, South Korea or Kyrgyzstan?
- South Korea, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between South Korea and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0, with South Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do South Korea and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- South Korea ranks 23rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 23rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.