Kiribati vs Latvia: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Kiribati
60
in 2013
Latvia
60
in 2013
Kiribati rank
53rd
Latvia rank
53rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Kiribati
- Latvia
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 60 against 60 in Latvia, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 53rd and Latvia ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60 | 60 | 0 | β |
| 2010s | 60 | 60 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Kiribati or Latvia?
- Kiribati, at 60 against 60 in Latvia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Kiribati and Latvia?
- 0, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Latvia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Kiribati and Latvia rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Kiribati ranks 53rd and Latvia ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.