Kazakhstan vs Samoa: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Kazakhstan
63.33
in 2013
Samoa
63.33
in 2013
Kazakhstan rank
34th
Samoa rank
34th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Kazakhstan
- Samoa
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 63.33 against 63.33 in Samoa, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 34th and Samoa ranks 34th of 188 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 63.33 | 23.33 | Samoa |
| 2010s | 58.33 | 63.33 | 5 | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Kazakhstan or Samoa?
- Kazakhstan, at 63.33 against 63.33 in Samoa as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Kazakhstan and Samoa?
- 0, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Samoa?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Kazakhstan and Samoa rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 34th and Samoa ranks 34th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.