Kazakhstan vs North Macedonia: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Kazakhstan
63.33
in 2013
North Macedonia
63.33
in 2013
Kazakhstan rank
34th
North Macedonia rank
34th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Kazakhstan
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 63.33 against 63.33 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 34th and North Macedonia ranks 34th of 191 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 46 | 6 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 58.33 | 58.33 | 0 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Kazakhstan or North Macedonia?
- Kazakhstan, at 63.33 against 63.33 in North Macedonia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Kazakhstan and North Macedonia?
- 0, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and North Macedonia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Kazakhstan and North Macedonia rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Kazakhstan ranks 34th and North Macedonia ranks 34th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.