Indonesia vs Solomon Islands: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Indonesia
60
in 2013
Solomon Islands
60
in 2013
Indonesia rank
53rd
Solomon Islands rank
53rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Indonesia
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 60 against 60 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Solomon Islands ahead.
Indonesia ranks 53rd and Solomon Islands ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.33 | 56.67 | 0.6667 | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 60 | 59.17 | 0.8333 | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Indonesia or Solomon Islands?
- Indonesia, at 60 against 60 in Solomon Islands as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Indonesia and Solomon Islands?
- 0, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Solomon Islands?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Indonesia and Solomon Islands rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Indonesia ranks 53rd and Solomon Islands ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.