Indonesia vs Papua New Guinea: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Indonesia
60
in 2013
Papua New Guinea
60
in 2013
Indonesia rank
53rd
Papua New Guinea rank
53rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Indonesia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 60 against 60 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Indonesia ranks 53rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 53rd of 191 countries.
Indonesia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Indonesia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.33 | 56.67 | 0.6667 | Indonesia |
| 2010s | 60 | 57.5 | 2.5 | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Indonesia or Papua New Guinea?
- Indonesia, at 60 against 60 in Papua New Guinea as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Indonesia and Papua New Guinea?
- 0, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Indonesia and Papua New Guinea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Indonesia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Indonesia ranks 53rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 53rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.