India vs Kiribati: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
India
60
in 2013
Kiribati
60
in 2013
India rank
53rd
Kiribati rank
53rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- India
- Kiribati
How they compare
India currently reports 60 against 60 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
India ranks 53rd and Kiribati ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.67 | 60 | 3.33 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 60 | 60 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, India or Kiribati?
- India, at 60 against 60 in Kiribati as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between India and Kiribati?
- 0, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Kiribati?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do India and Kiribati rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- India ranks 53rd and Kiribati ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.