Iceland vs Norway: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Iceland
63.33
in 2013
Norway
63.33
in 2013
Iceland rank
34th
Norway rank
34th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Iceland
- Norway
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 63.33 against 63.33 in Norway, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 34th and Norway ranks 34th of 190 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.33 | 63.33 | 10 | Norway |
| 2010s | 57.5 | 63.33 | 5.83 | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Iceland or Norway?
- Iceland, at 63.33 against 63.33 in Norway as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Iceland and Norway?
- 0, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Norway?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Iceland and Norway rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Iceland ranks 34th and Norway ranks 34th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.