Hungary vs Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Hungary
43.33
in 2013
Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of
43.33
in 2013
Hungary rank
127th
Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of rank
127th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Hungary
- Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 43.33 against 43.33 in Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 127th and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of ranks 127th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.33 | 43.33 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 43.33 | 43.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Hungary or Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of?
- Hungary, at 43.33 against 43.33 in Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Hungary and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of?
- 0, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Hungary and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Hungary ranks 127th and Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of ranks 127th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.