Guinea-Bissau vs Uzbekistan: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Guinea-Bissau
40
in 2013
Uzbekistan
40
in 2013
Guinea-Bissau rank
137th
Uzbekistan rank
137th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 40 against 40 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 137th and Uzbekistan ranks 137th of 191 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40 | 36.67 | 3.33 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 40 | 37.5 | 2.5 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Guinea-Bissau or Uzbekistan?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 40 against 40 in Uzbekistan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Guinea-Bissau and Uzbekistan?
- 0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Uzbekistan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Uzbekistan rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 137th and Uzbekistan ranks 137th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.