Grenada vs Samoa: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score

Grenada
63.33
in 2013
Samoa
63.33
in 2013
Grenada rank
34th
Samoa rank
34th

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Grenada
  • Samoa
0204060200520092013

How they compare

Grenada currently reports 63.33 against 63.33 in Samoa, a difference of 0.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Grenada ranks 34th and Samoa ranks 34th of 188 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 63.33 63.33 0
2010s 63.33 63.33 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Grenada or Samoa?
Grenada, at 63.33 against 63.33 in Samoa as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Grenada and Samoa?
0, with Grenada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Samoa?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Grenada and Samoa rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Grenada ranks 34th and Samoa ranks 34th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.