Grenada vs Iceland: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Grenada
63.33
in 2013
Iceland
63.33
in 2013
Grenada rank
34th
Iceland rank
34th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Grenada
- Iceland
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 63.33 against 63.33 in Iceland, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 34th and Iceland ranks 34th of 188 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.33 | 53.33 | 10 | Grenada |
| 2010s | 63.33 | 57.5 | 5.83 | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Grenada or Iceland?
- Grenada, at 63.33 against 63.33 in Iceland as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Grenada and Iceland?
- 0, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Iceland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Grenada and Iceland rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Grenada ranks 34th and Iceland ranks 34th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.