Georgia vs Mongolia: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score

Georgia
73.33
in 2013
Mongolia
70
in 2013
Georgia rank
14th
Mongolia rank
16th

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Georgia
  • Mongolia
020406080200520092013

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 73.33 against 70 in Mongolia, a difference of 3.33.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mongolia ahead.

Georgia ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 188 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Mongolia Difference Ahead
2000s 55.33 66.67 11.33 Mongolia
2010s 72.5 68.33 4.17 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Georgia or Mongolia?
Georgia, at 73.33 against 70 in Mongolia as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Georgia and Mongolia?
3.33, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mongolia?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Georgia and Mongolia rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Georgia ranks 14th and Mongolia ranks 16th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.