Gambia vs Micronesia, Federated States of: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Gambia
26.67
in 2013
Micronesia, Federated States of
26.67
in 2013
Gambia rank
176th
Micronesia, Federated States of rank
176th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Gambia
- Micronesia, Federated States of
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 26.67 against 26.67 in Micronesia, Federated States of, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Micronesia, Federated States of has been ahead every year.
Gambia ranks 176th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 176th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Micronesia, Federated States of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.67 | 26.67 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 26.67 | 26.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Gambia or Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Gambia, at 26.67 against 26.67 in Micronesia, Federated States of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Gambia and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 0, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Micronesia, Federated States of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Gambia and Micronesia, Federated States of rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Gambia ranks 176th and Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 176th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.