Gambia vs Libya: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score

Gambia
26.67
in 2013
Libya
26.67
in 2013
Gambia rank
175th
Libya rank
175th

Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time

  • Gambia
  • Libya
0102030200520092013

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 26.67 against 26.67 in Libya, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 175th and Libya ranks 175th of 188 countries.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Libya Difference Ahead
2000s 26.67 13.33 13.33 Gambia
2010s 26.67 20 6.67 Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Gambia or Libya?
Gambia, at 26.67 against 26.67 in Libya as of 2013.
What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Gambia and Libya?
0, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Libya?
9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
How do Gambia and Libya rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
Gambia ranks 175th and Libya ranks 175th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,710 data points, 2005–2013
Last refreshed

The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.