France vs Mozambique, Republic of: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
France
53.33
in 2013
Mozambique, Republic of
53.33
in 2013
France rank
83rd
Mozambique, Republic of rank
83rd
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- France
- Mozambique, Republic of
How they compare
France currently reports 53.33 against 53.33 in Mozambique, Republic of, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was France ahead.
France ranks 83rd and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 83rd of 190 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Mozambique, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 53.33 | 48 | 5.33 | France |
| 2010s | 53.33 | 53.33 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, France or Mozambique, Republic of?
- France, at 53.33 against 53.33 in Mozambique, Republic of as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between France and Mozambique, Republic of?
- 0, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Mozambique, Republic of?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do France and Mozambique, Republic of rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- France ranks 83rd and Mozambique, Republic of ranks 83rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.