Fiji vs Tunisia: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Fiji
56.67
in 2013
Tunisia
56.67
in 2013
Fiji rank
67th
Tunisia rank
67th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Fiji
- Tunisia
How they compare
Fiji currently reports 56.67 against 56.67 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Fiji ahead.
Fiji ranks 67th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 190 countries.
Fiji has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Fiji | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.67 | 38.67 | 18 | Fiji |
| 2010s | 56.67 | 56.67 | 0 | β |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Fiji or Tunisia?
- Fiji, at 56.67 against 56.67 in Tunisia as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Fiji and Tunisia?
- 0, with Fiji ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Fiji and Tunisia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Fiji and Tunisia rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Fiji ranks 67th and Tunisia ranks 67th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.