Ethiopia vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
Ethiopia
16.67
in 2013
Lao People's Democratic Republic
16.67
in 2013
Ethiopia rank
187th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
187th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- Ethiopia
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 16.67 against 16.67 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Lao People's Democratic Republic has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 187th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 187th of 190 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Lao People's Democratic Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.67 | 16.67 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 16.67 | 16.67 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, Ethiopia or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- Ethiopia, at 16.67 against 16.67 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between Ethiopia and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 0, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do Ethiopia and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- Ethiopia ranks 187th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 187th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.