El Salvador vs Jordan: Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score
El Salvador
30
in 2013
Jordan
30
in 2013
El Salvador rank
168th
Jordan rank
168th
Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score over time
- El Salvador
- Jordan
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 30 against 30 in Jordan, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 168th and Jordan ranks 168th of 191 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.67 | 30 | 3.33 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 29.17 | 30 | 0.8333 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score, El Salvador or Jordan?
- El Salvador, at 30 against 30 in Jordan as of 2013.
- What is the difference in protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score between El Salvador and Jordan?
- 0, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Jordan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2013.
- How do El Salvador and Jordan rank globally for protecting minority investors (db06-14 methodology) - score?
- El Salvador ranks 168th and Jordan ranks 168th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Protecting minority investors (DB06-14 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for protecting minority investors benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator set. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-14 studies.